skip to content
Mehdi Mehdikhani

In my current work, we develop software for industrial robotics systems, and Jenkins has become our main CI/CD tool. After trying different solutions, I think Jenkins is particularly good choice for companies working in industrial automation and robotics.

The biggest advantage is that everything runs on your own infrastructure. In industrial companies, you often have strict security requirements and cannot send your code to external cloud services. Jenkins runs entirely on-premises, which means your proprietary robotics algorithms never leave your network. We have our Jenkins server on company infrastructure and use development workstations as build agents - this gives us full control over the entire pipeline. Another key benefit is hardware integration. Robotics development needs specific hardware for testing like specialized controllers or actual robot arms. Jenkins can easily connect to these physical systems because it runs locally, something impossible with cloud-based solutions.

For industrial companies, Jenkins cost model makes more sense than cloud alternatives. You pay once for infrastructure and scale without per-minute billing. When running extensive hardware-in-the-loop tests that take hours, this becomes significant saving. Jenkins also handles mixed technology stacks well - we build C++ libraries, Python packages, and firmware in the same pipeline using different plugins.

I won’t lie - Jenkins has steep learning curve and the UI feels outdated. But once configured, it’s very reliable. For industrial environments where you keep the same system for years, this stability matters more than modern UI. In our experience, Jenkins excels at complex robotics scenarios - we have pipelines that build firmware, flash hardware, run tests on physical robots, and generate compliance reports. For industrial robotics companies prioritizing security, cost control, and hardware integration, Jenkins remains solid choice despite its complexity.